https://headsalon.org/archives/5073.html A Salon for Heads, No Sofa for Ass Fri, 23 Jan 2026 05:27:46 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38 https://headsalon.org/archives/5073.html#comment-393282 Wed, 24 Sep 2014 20:10:53 +0000 http://headsalon.org/?p=5073#comment-393282 恩，辉总能不能举几个反例，我不知道从哪下手

]]> https://headsalon.org/archives/5073.html#comment-393276 Wed, 24 Sep 2014 20:04:24 +0000 http://headsalon.org/?p=5073#comment-393276 嗯，逻辑上成立，但事实看起来不像是这样

]]> https://headsalon.org/archives/5073.html#comment-392207 Tue, 23 Sep 2014 10:50:09 +0000 http://headsalon.org/?p=5073#comment-392207 碰到一篇文章，也讲乳房的进化，与辉总的解释不同。这作者看着也是兴趣广泛的人。
http://www.davidbrin.com/neoteny1.html#14back
前半段都是老生常谈，从
3.A large fraction of human males are not (from a solemn female point of view) suitable for pair-bonding or fatherhood. High male variability probably meant that choice remained an important, even crucial, activity for our female ancestors.
开始是他的主要观点。我觉得辉总的比较有道理，但对进化的各种假说我还不太会找例子证实/证伪。

]]>